A.1 Majority Voting The Majority Voting (MV) is the most intuitive algorithm for aggregate LFs' annotations. We omit this case for simplicity. A.3 Snorkel MeTaL The parameters µof Snorkel MeTaL [31] are given by Bayes' theorem we have: pµ(y = c,λ = m) = pµ(λ = m | y = c)p(y = c) = Consider a label model g(L(x),x) F in arbitrary functional class F, e.g., neural network, and having additional dependency on data feature x4, we can still approximate such complicated function with identity function-based label model g W(x)(L(x)) similar to the aforementioned one except that W(x): X RM (C+1) C is a similarly complicated function, e.g., neural network, that maps each data x X to a unique label model parameter W(x). We leave the exploration of more complicated form of label models into future work. B.1 Case 1: identity function We define the loss with reweighted sample as, Instead of employing the decomposing loss function, we introduce a more general influence estimation method - weight-moving Influence, which get ride of the loss decomposition and approximation and is agnostic to the selection of σ() function.

Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) aggregates the source votes of multiple weak supervision sources into probabilistic training labels, which are in turn used to train an end model. With its increasing popularity, it is critical to have some tool for users to understand the influence of each component (e.g., the source vote or training data) in the pipeline and interpret the end model behavior. To achieve this, we build on Influence Function (IF) and propose source-aware IF2, which leverages the generation process of the probabilistic labels to decompose the end model's training objective and then calculate the influence associated with each (data, source, class) tuple. These primitive influence score can then be used to estimate the influence of individual component of PWS, such as source vote, supervision source, and training data. On datasets of diverse domains, we demonstrate multiple use cases: (1) interpreting incorrect predictions from multiple angles that reveals insights for debugging the PWS pipeline, (2) identifying mislabeling of sources with a gain of 9%-37% over baselines, and (3) improving the end model's generalization performance by removing harmful components in the training objective (13%-24% better than ordinary IF).

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

This problem is important to robustly learning from data that are corrupted by,e.g., random noise and adversarial examples. The standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) for such data, however, may easily overfit noise and thus suffers from sub-optimal performance. In this paper, we observe that model predictions can substantially benefit the training process: self-adaptive training significantly mitigates the overfitting issue and improves generalization over ERM under both random and adversarial noise.

Toachievethis, webuildonInfluenceFunction(IF)andproposesource-awareIF 2,whichleverages the generation process of the probabilistic labels to decompose the end model's training objective and then calculate the influence associated with each (data, source, class)tuple.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/